Saturday, 31 March 2012

My blogger experience


Kia Orana everyone first of all I would like to take a moment and thank you all for the positive feedback, the suggestions and the on-going communication from my group.  This blog idea is such an awesome experience for me personally I hope that we could carry this on with our own personal reflection on our daily practices in the future. 

Technology is great for our children to get use to and adapt their life style to, but don’t you all think that this is limiting the full development of the child.  Example climbing a tree is such a fantastic experience but in our days we don’t support children to climb the tree everything that children experience and do is planned around children’s safety! Safety! Safety!     Ministry of education, (1996) states that “Children will have the opportunity to create and act on their own ideas, to develop knowledge and skills in areas that interest them, and to make an increasing number of their own decisions and judgments”(p.40).  We say that we are empowering the children, for me I referred this to my own personal philosophy it says that I believe in free play, and empowering children to facilitate and make a choice.  So we have all the resource available for the children to use, but do they really want to use them or they only use this because it’s the only resource available to them or they just find it interesting to see or use this tool.

In class we identified some of the different technology that we practice with children, but it never occur to me that what I have been doing with the children was technology I always thought that technology was something that involve electricity.  Technology has taken away the fun in playing I say, it has also taken away the creative thinking of children and it has replaced it with swing, slide, the plastic resource, man-made resource that we see every day.  Technology has taken over the children daily interacting with the natural environment and resource.  “According to Piaget (1962), children’s thinking shows their unique way of understanding and interpreting the world” Arthur, Beecher, Death, Dockett & Farmer, (2007).p.92. 

In my centre children is exposed to different types of technology because it’s our duty as educators to keep up with machinery and, we extend and support children interest regardless of what it is.  Technology also helps us with our daily chores to document children learning, but we still need to realise its more attractive when its handmade using the natural resource.  Yes I agree “technology is about helping people and solving problems” Smori, S (1999)p.5. But we need to rethink about the different technology that children are exposed to.  I find that technology plays a huge part in our everyday life, it provides for us in different ways and it takes care of us also, but it needs to be positive and support children to reach their full potential.

What I learnt from this assessment is that doing a blog to reflect is great, it gives me the chance to communicate with others, and their feedbacks and suggestion on the spot also benefits my practice to do better and make the learning experience more fun and interesting.  I also learned that this is easy, it only takes a couple of minutes to document and record but it’s a long time impact on me as an educator to know that I can write something and others can suggest ideas or give me feedback on my practice.   I also understand that a reflective teacher is a great teacher, so I’m glad that I got the opportunity to take part in the blog, I have gain so much from doing this it will help me in the future.  My centre is now in the process of putting through a proposal for our centre to start up a blog for our parents and our Cook Island community specially our early childhood centres we have relationship with here in New Zealand and back home in the Cook Island.     

 Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S. & Farmer, S,. (2007).  Programming &        planning in early childhood settings. (4th ed.).  New South Wales, Australia:    Cengage Learning

Smori, S. (1999) Technology in Early Childhood. Early Education, 19, 5-10.    

Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki, he Whāriki mātauranga mo nga mokopuna    o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning    Media     

Friday, 23 March 2012

Using natural resource for painting


This week in the centre the theme is Pacifika, referring back to my first blog as Rachael mentioned to include other cultures in the centre and that is exactly what is happening this week in the centre.  This whole week from Monday to Friday each island will have a day to facilitate a Pacifika culture from undertaking a performance and preparing a traditional meal for children to taste.  Santrock, (2009) Like Piaget theory, Vygotsky’s sociocultural cognitive theory “emphasized that children actively construct their knowledge and understanding through social interaction and culture”( p. 25).  
  What trapped my attention today was children’s painting.  From where I was sitting I saw a group of children surrounding the table. I saw them just looking at the paintbrush but preferred to use fingers to paint a picture. As I was looking from a distance I thought to myself so how can I support this learning experience for this group of children.  I gave them a good 15 minutes to see what will happen next but they were still using fingers to paint.  So I decided to gather some natural effects from the outdoors and get some of the children to come and help me collect the item.  Once I and the children collected some natural resource I explained to the children what these items can be used for.  I showed them once how to create a picture using these resources and just empowered them to continue painting.  I stepped back and continued to observe from a distance.  Ministry of Education,(1996) states that “An early childhood programme for young children should provide a rich bank of experiences from which the children can learn to make sense of their world and the world around them”(p.25).  
It was their choice to use what was there or they could continue to use fingers to paint.  I saw the children using the tools and really consuming their initiative to create a really awesome picture.  The natural resource was so interesting for the children to see being used as a paintbrush.  I notice that when the children were using the tools their eyes were scanning the whole tools to see how they could place the item on the paper.  The natural resource gave children knowledge that they can use whatever they want to be creative, and not only a paintbrush can be used to paint but you can use variety of resource as long you can be creative with your ideas.  Some children were using the tools as a paintbrush and some were just putting paint on the items and sticking it on the paper. 
I saw that change is a good thing for children, because when the children use the paintbrush all the time they get so board using the same thing over and over again so provide children with variety of resource to implement their creative skills and share ideas with their peers.  The natural resource was good for them because it gave them an understanding that it is okay to use any resource form the outdoor and you can make pictures out of anything.    
I was so please with the turned out of this learning experience because it made me reflect on that moment and what I was feeling from observing the children.  I enjoyed it so much that I decided to have a group hug with the children.  As I reflect on that particular time I thought about when I was growing up I did not use paintbrush, my teacher used to make me and my classmates go out and break little brunches off the trees, fetch a rock and hit the end pit of the brunches with the rock.  Once the end pit was flat and it was squashed then it was good to be used to paint.  I thought that was a great way to utilise the natural resource. Gonzalez-Mena, (2006) explain that Vygotsky’s “ZPD” Zone of Proximal Development” provides children with opportunities to help each other by scaffolding their learning. This method is strongly used in the Pacific Island culture and also through “AKO” which is the tuakana/teina relationship (pg 23).
Reference List
Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2008). Foundations of early childhood education: Teaching children in a diverse society (4th ed.). Boston, United States of America: McGraw Hill


Santrock, J.W. (2009). Lifespan development (11th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill

Ministry of Education. (1996). Te whāriki, he whaariki mātauranga mo nga mokopuna o Aotearoa : Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.